Legal Opinion
Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 17, 2002No. CIV. 00-00382BMKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MANUFACTURING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT V OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Shell Oil Company, Shell Petroleum, Inc., Shell Chemical Company and Shell Chemicals Ltd. (collectively “the Shell Defendants”) move pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro- eedure (“FRCP 12(b)(6)”) to dismiss Count V of the Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint. Defendants Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) and Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (“Great Lakes”) join in the Shell Defendants’ motion. 1 A hearing on the motion was held on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thompson v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. American Cyanamid Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Splendorio v. Bilray Demolition Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- City of Bloomington, Indiana v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parker v. Brush Wellman, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- In re Dicamba Herbicides Litig.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
- Aana v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013