Hausman v. Department of Institutions & Agencies
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Hall, J.
This public assistance case arose as the result of a reduction in the monthly amount paid by the Mercer County Welfare Board for the subsistence of respondent and her child under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program (ADC), a program authorized and partly financed by the federal government. 42 U. S. C. A. § 601 et seq.; N. J. 8. A. 44:10-1 et seq.; see Motyka v. McCorkle, 58 N. J. 165, 168-169 (1971). The reduction came about because of the entry into the household, previously consisting only of the two recipients, of a third…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anderson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Grossman v. GrossmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Hurley v. Van LareDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Communications Workers v. Union Cty. Welfare Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Annie Taylor, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor, Dependent Child, Margaret Taylor v. Abe Lavine, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner of the New Yorkstate Department of Social Services, and James M. Shuart, Individually, and Inhis Capacity as Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Socialservices,appellants. Rose Hurley, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Doreen Hurley,et Al. v. Barry Van Lare, Individually and in His Capacity as Acting Commissioner of Thestate of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.