Legal Opinion · Dissent

Banowsky v. Backstrom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2019No. 96200-6Published

1Dissent

YU, J. (dissenting)

¶66 The Civil Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction do not purport "to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the courts of limited jurisdiction." CRLJ 82. In this case, the majority's interpretation of CRLJ 14A(b) does just that by extending a district court's judicial authority to cases over which it never *555acquired subject matter jurisdiction. I would affirm the Court of Appeals' well-reasoned decision, which gives meaning to CRLJ 14A(b) while respecting the legislature's exclusive constitutional authority to establish the powers, duties and jurisdiction of district…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Matter of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Adoption of BuehlWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Young v. KonzWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Smith v. Whatcom County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API