State v. Delaware Saengerbund, Inc.
New York Court of General Session of the Peace
Indictment (No. 37, January Term, 1914); on error, — Boyce —, 91 Ail. 290. The Delaware Saengerbund, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, was indicted for selling liquor without a license, in violation of 14 Del. Laws, c. 418, as amended.
Read the full summary
Indictment (No. 37, January Term, 1914); on error, — Boyce —, 91 Ail. 290. The Delaware Saengerbund, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, was indicted for selling liquor without a license, in violation of 14 Del. Laws, c. 418, as amended. The facts were submitted to the jury and questions of law addressed to the court on the following statement of facts: “ * * * It is agreed by and between the parties hereto, the State • of Delaware acting by and through the Attorney General, and the defendant acting by and through Robert G. Harman, Esq., and Robert H. Richards, Esq., its attorneys, that…
1Opinion of the Court
Woolley, J.,
charged the jury as follows:
Gentlemen of the jury:—The acts for which the defendant has been indicted, and the facts upon which this case is submitted to you for your determination, have been admitted and agreed to by the state and by the defendant, in the case as stated and read in your hearing, thereby dispensing with the necessity of formal proofs. Under this agreed state of facts the defendant is guilty or innocent of the misdemeanor charged to it by the indictment, according as the court states and instructs you upon law applicable thereto.
The admitted facts of this case,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. AmedySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Klein v. Livingston ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. KlineOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Marmont v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wright v. MoffittSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981