United States v. McBride Studios
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Octagonal pieces of marble imported at the port of New York were classified by the collector of customs as manufactures of marble and assessed for duty at 50 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 233 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:
233. Marble, breccia, onyx, alabaster, and jet, wholly or partly manufactured into monuments, benches, vases, and other articles, and articles of which these substances or any of them is the component material of chief value * * * not specially provided for, 50 per centum ad valorem.
The importer protested that the goods were paving…
2Cited by6 opinions
- R. L. Swearer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Selectile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Quality Marble & Granite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Richard Shipping Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- United States v. General Shipping & Trading Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.