Legal Opinion
Warshaw v. Concentra Health Services
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 2010No. Civil Action 07-1994PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLAK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Brian Warshaw alleges that his former employer, defendant TEKsystems, Inc. (“TEK”), a subsidiary of defendant Allegis Group, Inc. (“Allegis”), discriminated and retaliated against him in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa. Stat. § 951 et seq. Plaintiffs allegations against TEK and Allegis stem in part from a drug test administered at TEK’s request by defendant Concentra Health Services (“Concentra”), which plaintiff claims was negligent in…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rubano v. Farrell Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Jakomas v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Mills v. Temple UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Kiniropoulos v. Northampton County Child Welfare ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.