Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 29, 2004No. 2677, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

Appellant Antoine Clay Faulkner shot and killed Quincy Powers. Faulkner claims that he “had to” because Powers was about to shoot him. In a bench trial, the Circuit Court for Baltimore County convicted Faulkner of first degree murder and committing a felony with a handgun. Faulkner now challenges the legality of his arrest, the admissibility of his confession, and the court’s rejection of his imperfect self-defense claim.

Faulkner asks us to decide what type of warrant police may use when they plan to make a home arrest in non-exigent circumstances. Specifically, he asserts that,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Russell v. HarmsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Olson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Lincoln v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Cross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Russell, Tracy v. Harms, BryanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API