Legal Opinion
Foretich v. Glamour
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 19, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-3099PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GESELL, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for partial summary judgment. Plaintiffs have opposed. The motion has been fully briefed.
This is one of series of suits and counter-suits filed in the Washington metropolitan area arising out of a bitter, lengthy, and highly-publicized child custody proceeding before the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. In this instance, Eric Foretich and his mother and father have brought a libel action claiming, primarily, that they were defamed by an article in the November 1988 issue of Glamour magazine. The subject of the article was the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Caudle v. ThomasonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Construction Interior Systems, Inc. v. Donohoe CompaniesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Foretich v. CBS, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Epic Metals Corp. v. Condec, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.