Legal Opinion

Axtell v. Axtell

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Cyrus F. Axtell against Amelia E. Axtell for divorce. Decree for complainant.

1Opinion of the CourtDayton, J.

Further reflection, aided by briefs of counsel, brings me to a conclusion different from, that intimated at close of the trial. The record shows plaintiff always provided a suitable home for the defendant, and that on May 25, 1908, when his business required his absence from this city for a considerable period, he requested her to *645reside where they could more frequently be together. It was her duty to accept this suggestion. Her refusal to do so was unwarranted. He was necessarily recalled to this city about May 31st, and naturally went to his apartment. Finding it still furnished, but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thayer v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Pollock v. . PollockNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Allen v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Roth v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Krauss v. KraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API