Legal Opinion

Mott v. Koch

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 24, 1909No. 2137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for a new trial; from city court of Brunswick — Court-land Symmes, judge pro hac vice. July 10, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

At the May term of the city court of Brunswick the case was tried and the motion for new trial was filed and set down for hearing on the third day of July, 1909. The motion was based on the usual general grounds, and attached to it was an order providing that the movant should “have until the hearing, whenever it may be, to prepare and present for approval a brief of the evidence and charge of the court in said case, and the presiding judge may enter his approval thereon at any time, either in term or vacation, and if the hearing of the motion shall be in vacation, and the brief of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pope v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Chandler v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Oliver v. BensonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. McCormick v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Quick Rx Drugs, Inc. v. Bryant RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API