Legal Opinion
Jaksa v. Regents of University of Michigan
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 21, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-6284PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FEIKENS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Christopher Jaksa, was suspended for one term from the University of Michigan for cheating on a final exam. Plaintiff argues that he was denied procedural due process, and brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1982) against the Regents of the University of Michigan, Harold Shapiro (University President), and Eugene Nissen (Assistant Dean of Student Academic Affairs). This case is currently before me on cross-motions for summary judgment. Two evidentiary hearings have been held. For reasons stated herein, plaintiff's motion for summary…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Raymond J. Gorman, III v. University of Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Sean Michael Flaim v. Medical College of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Arthur Nickolas Newsome v. Batavia Local School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- John Doe v. Univ. of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Boehm v. University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.