Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Teer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 27, 2009No. SC 89501Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

ZEL M. FISCHER, Judge.

I concur in the result of the principal opinion. I write separately to express my views more completely about certain aspects of this case and in particular to encourage courts to restrain from judicial emasculation of legislative direction.

In McMillan v. Pennsylvania, 477 U.S. 79, 93, 106 S.Ct. 2411, 91 L.Ed.2d 67 (1986), the United States Supreme Court made clear that there is no constitutional right to jury sentencing. Missouri, however, grants the guilty the statutory right to jury sentencing unless that right is waived or subject to removal by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. JenningsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. EmerySupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. State v. WynnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. StreetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API