Legal Opinion
United States v. Witmer
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 8, 1993No. Civ. A. 1:CV-93-1410PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, Chief Judge.
Before the court are the myriad remaining motions and petitions in this consolidated action. In addition to the motions which were addressed in this court’s September 9, 1993 order, the United States has filed a petition to enforce the Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) issued to Respondents Witmer and Kelly. Witmer and Kelly have responded to the petition and, subsequent to their response, requested leave to file a supplemental memorandum with respect to the petition. Harsco 1 has filed a petition to set aside the CIDs issued to it, as well as a request for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Ronald P. MarkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Hambarian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Kersavage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- In re Oral Testimony of a Witness Subpoenaed Pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand No. 98-19District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.