Oystermen's Dock Co. v. Downing
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtScudder, J.
The lands under the waters of Oyster bay are town lands, held by the representatives of the town of Oyster Bay for the public good. (Tiffany v. Town of Oyster Bay, 209 N. Y. 1; Town of Brookhaven v. Smith, 188 id. 74.) The proposed lease for fifty years at the nominal yearly rental of $100 with a renewal option for a like period, under all the circumstances shown in this case, is not for the public good and should not in equity be sanctioned. Practically, it constitutes a conveyance of the fee under the guise of a lease. It is contrary to the will of the voters of the town as expressed by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coxe v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Tiffany v. . Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- People ex rel. Breckenridge v. Village of Ocean BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Waters v. SamuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Matter of Oystermen's Dock Co. v. DowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Earhart v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Sunno v. Samuel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.