Legal Opinion

Lipkin v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided May 29, 2008No. GDTC-T-06-119-PMGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GUERNSEY, Chief Judge

As a result of injuries sustained by the Plaintiff on February 16, 2006, the Plaintiff has brought two actions, the first against the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority and the second against a non-Tribal entity, Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing (hereafter “Drive Medical”), alleged to be *463the manufacturer of a walking assistance device, the Go-Lite Rollator. These two actions were consolidated by order of this Court on March 7, 2007. Before the Court is Drive Medical’s Motion for Summary Judgment; the claims against the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Good Earth Restaurant CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Gerrity v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API