Legal Opinion

Gaskins v. Gaskins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 25, 1935No. 10503PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

1. A motion was made to dismiss tile writ of error on tlie grounds, (a) that the bill of exceptions is “unintelligible;” (b) that the “plaintiff in error files exceptions pendente lite to the rulings complained of, . . and thereafter comes . . by- direct bill of exceptions, each assignment of error being complained of as error is assigned in a direct bill, and each assignment of error is also complained of in exceptions pendente lite; therefore his bill of exceptions is not a direct bill; and as no motion for new trial was filed, there is no exception in the usual mode…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Garrick v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Shuford v. ShufordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. State Mutual Life Insurance v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Dobbins v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. MONDY v. MAGNOLIA ADVANCED MATERIALS, INCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  3. Mondy v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  4. Ricci v. Bove's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  5. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API