Gaskins v. Gaskins
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
1. A motion was made to dismiss tile writ of error on tlie grounds, (a) that the bill of exceptions is “unintelligible;” (b) that the “plaintiff in error files exceptions pendente lite to the rulings complained of, . . and thereafter comes . . by- direct bill of exceptions, each assignment of error being complained of as error is assigned in a direct bill, and each assignment of error is also complained of in exceptions pendente lite; therefore his bill of exceptions is not a direct bill; and as no motion for new trial was filed, there is no exception in the usual mode…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Garrick v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Shuford v. ShufordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- State Mutual Life Insurance v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Dobbins v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- MONDY v. MAGNOLIA ADVANCED MATERIALS, INCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- Mondy v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- Ricci v. Bove's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.