Mondy v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
NAHMIAS, Justice.
We granted a writ of certiorari in this case to decide whether, when a motion to recuse the trial judge is filed after the judge has orally held a party's attorney in contempt, the recusal motion must be decided before the judge may properly proceed to enter a written contempt order. In Mondy v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc., 341 Ga. App. 141, 797 S.E.2d 506 (2017), the Court of Appeals held that the trial judge can ignore the pending recusal motion and enter the contempt order. See id. at 142-143, 797 S.E.2d 506. We disapprove that holding, concluding that under Uniform…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- City of Gainesville v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- White Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Brockman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. MondorSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- State v. LOPEZ-CARDONASupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- FRAZEN v. DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ATLANTASupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.