Legal Opinion

State v. Richard Turner Kerr

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 2018No. Docket 44770PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLorello, Judge

Richard Turner Kerr appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence for grand theft by possession of stolen property. Kerr asserts that the district court violated his Fifth Amendment right during the sentencing hearing, rising to the level of fundamental error. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Kerr pled guilty to grand theft by possession of stolen property, I.C. § 18-2403(4), in exchange for the dismissal of an allegation that he is a persistent violator. The parties stipulated to recommend a period of retained jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. Von EhlingerIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  3. State v. Von EhlingerIdaho Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API