Legal Opinion

United States v. Abraham Glantzman, in 18875 Appeal of Irwin H. Meltzer, in No. 18899

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 23, 1971No. 18899_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

Abraham Glantzman, owner of an employment agency, and Irwin H. Meltzer, head of the agency’s unskilled labor department, were found guilty by a jury of falsifying government documents in prosecutions brought under 18 U.S.C. § *2001001 and 18 U.S.C. § 2.1 Although several reasons for reversing these convictions were submitted and have been considered,8 we have concluded that only the question of sufficiency of evidence merits discussion.

It is conceded that the Department of Labor and the Immigration and Naturalization Service were furnished false…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. FeinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. United States v. Louis H. Heithaus and Sheldon Selikoff, Louis H. HeithausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Richard BeckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. James J. Curran, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Gary RanumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. State v. LemkenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API