Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hoschar v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1939No. 27547Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The writ of mandamus will issue to compel the exercise of discretion, but not to control it. 25 Ohio Jurisprudence, 1003, Section 28; Sutphin v. State, ex rel. Jeby, 130 Ohio St., 183, 198 N. E., 483.

The petition pleads that the respondent made payments and then failed and refused to pay, but that pleading does not set forth in full or in substance the *447order of the commission discontinuing payments. If the order is based upon the ground that the injured employee has been fully compensated, the determination of the commission is final and mandamus will not lie in the absence of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Sutphin v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API