Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Kirkman v. Van Amringe
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.
The appellants, charged with a violation of section 1199 of the Penal Law, were held by the magistrate for a hearing. Writs of habeas corpus obtained by them were dismissed. The orders of dismissal were affirmed by the Appellate Division.
The sole question here is whether, within the intendment of that section, the appellants in any manner aided the transaction of any business in this State by a foreign insurance company which had not designated the Superintendent of Insurance as its attorney upon whom lawful process might be served.
The facts are undisputed. The appellants are officers of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Aetna Life Insurance v. DunkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- New York Life Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Stone v. Penn Yan, Keuka Park & Branchport RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Salzano v. Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- People Ex Rel. Sea Insurance v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. BosemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- General Electric Company v. Masters Mail Order Company of Washington, D.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Rybasack v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.