Legal Opinion

Morales v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 31, 1990No. 05-89-01331-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OVARD, Justice.

In this case, the critical issue is whether a criminal defendant can appeal directly from a jury finding that he is not competent to stand trial and that there is no substantial probability that he will attain competency in the near future. We hold that a judgment of incompetency to stand trial is not a final judgment. Instead, judgments from hearings on competency to stand trial are ancillary to some other proceeding such as a criminal trial or a mental illness hearing. The judgment of competency/incompetency to stand trial is not appealable until a final judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Ex Parte WatsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Parks v. HuffingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Celani v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  2. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Franklin v. Kyle, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
  4. Ex Parte Tarun Bhardwaj, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2019
  5. Rundles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API