Legal Opinion

Mangino v. Steel Contracting Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1967No. Appeal, 66PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

Rule 1030 of the Pa. Rules of Civil Procedure requires that all affirmative defenses including statute of limitations shall be pleaded in a responsive pleading under the heading of “New Matter.”

In this action of trespass, even though it appears on the record that the original complaint was never served and appellant did not reinstate her complaint or obtain service on appellee in the time permitted by Pa. R. C. P. 1010, (See Zarlinsky v. Laudenslager, 402 Pa. 290, 167 A. 2d 317 (1961) and Marucci v. Lippman, 406 Pa. 283, 177 A. 2d 616 (1962)) and hence the action…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zarlinsky v. LaudenslagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Marucci v. LippmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Royal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Tunnelton Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Citsay v. ReichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ziemba v. HagertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Mangino v. LielberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Blair v. Guthrie Development Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API