Legal Opinion

Barton v. Unknown

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 22, 2022No. 3:22-cv-01038Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM BARTON, Case No.: 3:22-cv-1038-MMA (DEB) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING CASE 13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 William Barton (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition 18 for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(the “Petition”). Doc. No. 1. 19 FAILURE TO SATISFY THE FILING FEE REQUIREMENT 20 Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has not moved to proceed in forma 21 pauperis. This Court cannot proceed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Mark Brittingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Paul Ashley, AKA Walter Paul Foster v. The State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. William Adams v. Bill Armontrout and William L. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API