Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hillabrand

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment in favor of tbe defendants, entered upon tbe dismissal of tbe complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Ready, J.:

Tbis action was brought against tbe sheriff of this county tO’ recover tbe sum of $326.50 received by him under an attachment in a suit in which Jacob Zoller was plaintiff and tbe firm of Groht & McLaren were defendants. After a demand for payment had been made upon tbe sheriff, Zoller caused an indemnity bond to be given to him by tbe defendants in tbis action, who were thereupon substituted as defendants herein.

It appears that tbe plaintiff was a shipper of butter and cheese to the firm of Groht & McLaren, commission merchants, and claimed to be selling under a del credere…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walter v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Greentree v. . RosenstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Kip v. Bank of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  4. Duguid v. EdwardsNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Sherwood v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plymouth Rubber Co. v. KnottCity of New York Municipal Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API