Legal Opinion
Carver v. Westinghouse Hanford Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1991No. 91-35002PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
John Carver and his fellow employees appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) in their action under the Employees Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. The appellants allege that WHC’s Operating and Engineering Pension Plan (HOEP Plan) improperly failed to recognize prior service for other contractors at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation (HNR). We affirm the summary judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
The parties have stipulated to the following facts. In 1986 the Department of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Watkins v. Westinghouse Hanford Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Golden Gate Restaurant v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.