Legal Opinion
Maddalino v. West
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided May 9, 2000No. 98-2251PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLDAWAY, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. KRAMER, Judge, filed a dissenting opinion.
HOLDAWAY, Judge:
Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), the petitioner, Patrick Maddalino, seeks attorney fees and expenses incurred during the prosecution of a petition to this Court for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. The Secretary has filed a response opposing the application. For the following reasons, the Court will deny the petitioner’s application.
I. FACTS
On December 7, 1998, the petitioner filed with this Court a petition for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Karnas v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- William Langton v. Philip Johnston, John Bruder, John Bruder v. Philip Johnston, John Bruder v. Philip JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Frances GUGLIETTI, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Costanza v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thayer v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- Armstrong v. New Mexico Disability Determination ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017