Bynum v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1ConcurrenceBenton, Judge
I believe the majority’s use of the “right for the wrong reason” principle is inappropriate under the circumstances of this case.
First, the Commonwealth does not argue that the principle is applicable to this case. Indeed, the Commonwealth concedes on brief that the trial judge’s pretrial suppression ruling, although “wrong ... [, it] has, however, become the law of the case.” The Commonwealth’s brief does not urge this Court to apply the “right for the wrong reason” analysis the majority invokes.
Second, the trial judge’s ruling suppressing the statement was a pretrial ruling that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988