Arturo Godinez v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
We grant the State’s motion for clarification, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following opinion in its place.
Arturo Godinez petitions for habeas corpus relief on two alternative grounds. First, he-argues that our affirmance-of his racketeering conviction on direct appeal is inconsistent with our subsequent reversal of his co-defendant’s conviction. Alternatively, he alleges that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issue upon which his co-defendant’s conviction was reversed. We grant the petition on the alternative ground of…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. SeherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Raulerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Romero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Joel De La Osa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Godinez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- McBride v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024