Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Stanley
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1983No. 82 Civ. 210 (DNE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This is an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (1976 & Supp. IV 1980) (“ERISA”) to compel the trustees of a profit-sharing plan to accelerate payment of the benefits held in the plaintiffs, a former employee’s, account such that he would receive a lump sum prior to the date set forth in the plan. The trustees refused the employee’s request on the ground that the plaintiff terminated his employment to work for a competitor. This action raises…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Ruetta Paris, Mildred Cawthon and Marge Kane v. Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Howard B. Wolf, Inc. And Eugene K. FriesenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Ralph Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc. And Revised Pension Plan of Michael Schiavone& Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morse v. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Morse v. StanleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- John S. Morse v. Edmund A. Stanley, Jr., Victor Simonte, Jr., Franz Von Ziegesar and Carl R. Pite, Michael Don Romacho v. Edmund A. Stanley, Jr., Victor Simonte, Jr., Franz Von Ziegesar and Carl R. Pite, Robert D. Cohen v. Edmund A. Stanley, Jr., Victor Simonte, Jr., Franz Von Ziegesar and Carl R. PiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984