Legal Opinion
Jerald D. v. Concord Group Insurance
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 14, 1999No. 97-462PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant Concord Group Insurance Companies appeals from a summary judgment determining that plaintiffs Jerald and Allison Waters were entitled to recover up to the full per o'eeurrence limits on their insurance policy as well as the policy held by their adult daughter, Jennifer, who suffered severe injuries when she was struck by a motorcycle. Concord Group also appeals the court’s ruling that the Waters were entitled to recover for their temporary loss of consortium with Jennifer. We reverse.
The material facts are undisputed. On July 8, 1995, an uninsured motorcyclist * struck…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Burlington v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Medlar v. Aetna Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- Webb v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Concord General Mutual Insurance v. MadoreSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Chamberlain v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Cindy Brillman v. New England Guaranty Insurance Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Commercial Construction Endeavors, Inc. v. Ohio Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.