Steenburg v. Harry Braunstein, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, J.:
Defendant has moved first to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that Plaintiff is not the real party in interest within the meaning of Rule 17(a) of the Rules of the Superior Court which is identical with Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. rule 17(a), 28 U.S.C.A. The Rule reads “Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest* * *.”
Defendant contends that this motion presents squarely the question whether an Insured is entitled to maintain an action in his own name against a third party for damages despite the fact that he has been fully paid for his loss by an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
- Blatz v. WilsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
3Cited by11 opinions
- C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Hoffman v. CohenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- DeVincentis v. Maryland Casualty CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- Strahorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.