Strahorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, J.:
The question is one of first impression in this State. Elsewhere, the cases are in confusion due, at least in part, to the manifold complexities existing in the parent-child relationship. The majority rule is that an unemancipated minor cannot sue a parent in tort in a case of ordinary negligence. Note 19 A. L. R. 2d 439; Wood v. Wood, 135 Conn. 280, 63 A. 2d 586; Skillin v. Skillin, 130 Me. 223, 154 A. 570; Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703, 9 So. 885, 13 L. R. A. 682; Luster v. Luster, 299 Mass. 480, 13 N. E. 2d 438; Martens v. Martens, 11 N. J. Misc. 705, 167 A. 227.
The rule is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Borst v. BorstWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Ruiz v. ClancySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parks v. ParksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
- Montgomery County v. Valk Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Crotta v. Home Depot, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Fields v. Synthetic Ropes, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.