Legal Opinion
United States v. Tropiano
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 20, 1968No. Crim. No. 12201PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS BE HELD WITHOUT BOND PENDING SENTENCE.
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
Immediately after the jury returned its verdict at 9:15 P.M. on Friday, November 15, 1968, convicting defendants Tropiano, Grasso and Pellegrino of extortion or attempted extortion affecting interstate commerce in violation of the Hobbs Anti-Racketeering Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and convicting Tropiano and Grasso of conspiring so to do, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, the government moved, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148, that each of the three defendants be held without bond pending imposition of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. DevlinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- United States v. George WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Paul John Carbo v. United States of America, Joseph Sica v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. ErwingDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Tropiano v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
- United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
- United States v. MedinaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983
- United States v. TropianoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.