Legal Opinion

Barnes & Armbruster v. Scranton Poor District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1932No. Appeal 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Defendant poor district advertised for bids for the erection and construction of an electrical line to connect the inside emergency lighting unit of its mental hospital Avith the line of the Abington Electric Company. Four bids were submitted, the lowest being that of plaintiffs for $1,250, and the next lowest being that of W. S. Hammerman for $1,295. After considering the bids the contract was awarded to Hammerman. Whereupon, plaintiffs filed this bill to enjoin letting the contract to Hammerman because he was not the lowest responsible bidder, and to obtain a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. ArensbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Wilson v. New Castle CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Hiorth v. Chester CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McSorleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. C & T Associates, Inc. v. Government of New Castle CountyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. SteinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Mayer Bros. Construction Co. v. Erie Parking AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Commonwealth v. McSorleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API