Legal Opinion

Mosheyev v. Pilevsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated August 11, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

It is well settled that summary judgment is a drastic remedy that is to be granted only where there is no clear triable issue of fact (see, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361). In deciding the motion, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Benincasa v. GarrubboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dykeman v. HehtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Perl v. MeherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Dorival v. DePassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Pinchevsky v. LasherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Hildebrandt v. StephanNew York Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API