Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. Grodsky

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 20, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.

In my opinion, the clerk of this court was right in sustaining defendant’s objections to the two items in the plaintiffs’ bill of costs, namely, twenty dollars on appeal to the Appellate Term before argument on affirmation of the order denying motion for new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, and forty dollars for argument.

*572Plaintiffs are the successful parties upon two appeals taken by the defendant, (1) from the judgment entered herein, and (2) from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence. On the taxation of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Davis v. Grand Rapids Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Nordmark v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hart v. Ithaca ConservatoryNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API