Legal Opinion

Nordmark v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed, with costs.. In so far as concerns the point of the appellant that the motion was not based upon a ease made and settled as required by rule 221 of the Rules of Civil Practice, we are of opinion that the appellant waived it. (Russell v. Randall, 123 N. Y. 436.) Moreover, the motion was made on the stenographer’s minutes and the pleadings, all of which were before the Special Term justice, who was also, the trial justice, and the record before us contains the record of the trial in addition…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Finkelstein v. GrodskyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API