Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Mitchell Auto Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 28, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Without determining whether or not the circuit court exceeded its jurisdiction in the respect complained of, the court will deny the writ of certiorari. The writ is not one of right, but will be granted or denied in the discretion of the court, according to the circumstances of each case a.s justice may require. The court has held that an appeal will lie from a void judgment. Taylor v. Bay St. Francis Drainage Dist., 171 Ark. 285, 284 S. W. 770.

It is also well settled in this State that error apparent on the face of the record may be reviewed on appeal without any bill of exceptions or motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Taylor v. Bay St. Francis Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hardin, Comm. of Revenues v. Norsworthy, Co. JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  2. Huff v. Hot Springs Savings, Trust and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Priest v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Helena-West Helena School District 2 v. Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Helena-West Helena School District 2 v. Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API