John F. Noud & Co. v. Stedman
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Van Burén; Bridgman, J., presiding. Bill by the John F. Noud Company against Alva Stedman, Ellen R. Avery, mortgagee, and others, to enforce a mechanic’s lien. On petition R. R. Brenner was allowed to intervene, claiming a lien. From the decree rendered, defendant Brenner appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
The purpose of these proceedings is to enforce a mechanic’s lien on certain premises in South Haven. Complainant made parties defendant the owners, mortgagee, and several other persons claiming statutory liens for labor and material. Defendant Brenner petitioned for and was given the right to intervene. He claimed a lien as contractor for the heating apparatus which he installed in the building. A hearing was had on the several claims, and the chancellor allowed some of them, but disallowed others, and among those disallowed was the claim of Brenner. Defendants Stedman, the owners of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Waters v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Godfrey Lumber Co. v. KlineMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lowrie & Webb Lumber Co. v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Grand River Lumber & Coal Co. v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Lallevich v. BartoszewizMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Huebner v. LashleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Lewis Manufacturing Co. v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.