Legal Opinion

Brimm v. Building Erection Services Co., Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 31, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-2187-KHVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VRATIL, District Judge.

Robert Brimm brings suit against Building Erection Services Company, Inc. (“BESCO”), alleging racial harassment and retaliation in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq. as amended, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. as amended. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #41) filed December 24, 2003, in which defendant seeks summary judgment on plaintiffs Title VII claims. For reasons stated below, the Court overrules…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Litton v. Maverick Paper Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API