Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 2, 2007No. 06-1202PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:
This action arises out of a contract between Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and the City of Corona, California (Corona) under which SCE agreed to install interconnection facilities to provide electrical interconnection service to Corona. Under the parties’ Interconnection Facilities Agreement (Facilities Agreement or Agreement), Corona paid SCE in advance the estimated cost of installing the interconnection facilities and SCE agreed to furnish Corona with a final trued-up invoice for the actual installation cost within twelve months after the facilities’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Waukesha v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Pennsylvania v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Association of Flight Attendants-CWA v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Defenders of Wildlife v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Transmission Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Fuentes-Fernandez & Company, Psc v. Corvus Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Louisville G&E Co. v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.