Legal Opinion

Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1997No. 96-35632Published

1Opinion of the Court

122 F.3d 830

38 Fed.R.Serv.3d 394, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 9419,

97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6849,

97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,092

Steven R. NUSOM; Marianne Nusom, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

COMH WOODBURN, INC., d/b/a Central Homes; Bonnie G. Tornow;

Shirley Ann Robins; Phil Morgan; Colleen Souther; CIT

Group/Sales Financing Inc.; Dave Eby, d/b/a Dave Eby Co.;

Fleetwood Homes Of Oregon Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-35632.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 8, 1997.

Decided Aug. 26, 1997.

Patricia Ferrell-French, West Linn, OR, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Lee M. Hess, Becker,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Goodwin; Concurrence · Reinhardt.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. James Richard Erdman v. Cochise County, Arizona and City of Douglas, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Ronald J. Radecki and Radecki's Service, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada, Dayton Haworth v. State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API