Legal Opinion

Gerseta Corporation v. Wessex-Campbell Silk Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 3, 1924No. 10PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Section 91 of the Negotiable Instruments Law (Consol. Laws N. Y. c. 38) declares that one is a holder of an instrument under certain enumerated conditions, of which one is “that he took it in good faith and for value.” Section 95 of the same statute declares that to constitute notice of a defect in the title of the person negotiating a bill or note, “the person to whom it is negotiated must have had actual notice of the infirmity or defect, or knowledge of such facts that his action in taking the instrument amounted to bad faith.”

This writ seems to us an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Cheever v. Pittsburgh, Shenango & Lake Erie RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Carlisle v. . NorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Meyer v. Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Paika v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ThorntonArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Fortier v. McRaeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Carador v. Sana Travel Service, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. Military Circle Pet Center 94, Inc. v. Docktor Pet Holdings, Ltd. (In Re Military Circle Pet Center 94, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  5. Thomes v. AtkinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API