Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Waterman v. J. S. Waterman & Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 30, 1933No. 32571PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELD, Chief Justice.

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel a corporation, J. S. Waterman & Co., Inc,, and its officers to transfer to the relatrix 1,127 shares of stock in the corporation, of the par value of 8100 each. The stock is represented by certificates acquired by William Waterman, now deceased, husband of the relatrix, during the matrimonial community between them. Mrs. Watermán obtained an ex parte judgment of court, in the matter of the Succession of William Waterman, declaring her to be the owner of half of the stock and usufructuary of the half inherited by her four minor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. GrauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Castleman v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reuter v. Reuter's SuccessionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. Succession of QuaglinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Guilott v. GuilottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Sheridan v. Le QuireLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Downs v. DownsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API