Legal Opinion

Parker v. Brush Wellman, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 10, 2006No. 1:04-cr-00606PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STORY, District Judge.

This case comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Enforce the March 29, 2005 Order [103] and Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the Class Claims [104]. The Court has reviewed the record, and now enters the following Order.

Background

Plaintiffs brought this putative class action alleging that Defendants are involved in the manufacture and/or use of. products containing beryllium, and that Plaintiffs were exposed to a respirable form of the substance, either by virtue of their work at the Lockheed Martin Corporation facility in Marietta,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Anthony v. Small Tube Manufacturing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. In Re Mtbe Products Liab. Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API