Legal Opinion
Hartsell Mills Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1940No. 4592PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petitioner operates a textile mill at Concord, N. C. The Board found that it refused to bargain collectively with a labor union representing its employees, that it interfered with self organization on the part of the employees, and that it was guilty of anti-union discrimination in the discharge of one Love. A cease and desist order in the usual form was entered, and petitioner was directed to reinstate Love with back pay. In the view which we take of the case, three questions are presented for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Art Metals Const. Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Swift & Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Albert J. Muick v. Glenayre ElectronicsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- National Labor Relations Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.