Legal Opinion
Dirkes v. Eitzen
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 3, 1939No. Patent Appeal 4054Published
1Opinion of the Court
103 F.2d 520 (1939)
DIRKES et al.
v.
EITZEN.
Patent Appeal No. 4054.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
May 3, 1939.
Eugene C. Brown, of Washington, D. C. (M. J. Reynolds and N. F. Presson, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Gustav Drews, of New York City (Hans v. Briesen, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.
JACKSON, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
- Blackford v. WilderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
- International Cellucotton Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.