Legal Opinion
United States v. Spagnuolo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 23, 1948No. 285, Docket 20992PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The defendant attacks his conviction below particularly because of asserted failure to prove his possession of the distilled spirits which were discovered with only counterfeit revenue stamps upon them, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Code, § 2803 (a, g). Upon the trial to the jury the principal witness for the prosecution was one Howard Johnson, a bartender, who testified that some months before the day in question he had bought liquor of a man who was accompanied by the defendant, and that the seller had given him a telephone number to use for further orders. On June…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. AndolschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Rossi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Cohen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Carl Turner Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Hood BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Dean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.