Legal Opinion
United States v. Canfield
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 24, 1939No. Q-53-MPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
We have reviewed the entire record of this action, as well as causes No. O-3-H and 7427-S. ,
During the time that the suit has been pending, various motions have been made and rulings entered which reflect this court’s views of issues which at such times have been presented for\ decision. Throughout the trial many important and crucial questions of evidence have been determined, and the transcript fully discloses the opinion of the court 'in such matters.
We have concluded that a further detailed memorandum is unnecessary, not only because the findings of fact and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re the Estate of RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- United States v. American Exchange Irving Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- United States v. First Capital Nat. Bank of Iowa CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Long Island Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Richard D. Leuschner v. First Western Bank and Trust Company, a California Banking Corporation, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. HofferbertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944
- Board of Sup'rs v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- United States v. BrodsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.